Heather W wrote:I will add here that it seems to at least me you harbor a resentment towards those of us that are TG and are telling us to go away and only interact with those like you by pointing out there are sites aimed more directly at the TG individual. I do wonder though how you are so aware of these and they are "nice and active"?
Let's be clear, I have not inferred that anyone on this venue did not belong or should "go away and only interact with those like you. . ."
However, with such reparette wit and double entendre responses. How could anyone possibly be laboring under that misapprehension? The listing of alternative sites belies the reality of the current status of "transgender" vs. "crossdresser" in the numbers of google "hits. Specifically, Transgender, 172,000,000. Crossdresser alone, with no mention of transgender 13,000,000. Exposure to transgenderism is widespread in contemporary society.
No I get it, the term, and probably the concept of "crossdressing" are actively falling out of vogue, as everyone is eager to embrace the concept of transgender. Real data to support my assertion are rare these days. As I have always maintained, especially going back to my concerns regarding the decline of Tri-ess, and the concerns that those who DO crossdress are different from those of the transgender crowd. You did acknowledge that fact:
Heather W wrote: As I said before CDs and TGs have very different issues and they need to be addressed accordingly. However as I also said before they do both have the common desire to be seen as just people and not abnormalities or aberrations or freaks and there the two groups intersect.
And, while you acknowledge they also have similar concerns, some areas of discussion are predicated on concerns other than strictly centered on the crossdresser. I would submit that introducing younger crossdressers to crossdressing websites with unmoderated transgenders is not without consequence. In the same way, consider the casual crossdresser who wants to introduce his wife or family to the idea of crossdressing with
out the idea that he wants to be "
a woman?" The result is minimized or ignored totally. Who cares about the damage it might to do a fragile family, right? As I mentioned several times in the Tri-ess issue, "You know what the difference between a crossdresser and a transgender is? A: about two years. . " Your commentary indirectly reflects this. You are quite sensitive to the needs and wants of transgender individuals, however, crossdressers will be treated as "confused."
And yeah, I do have an issue with that.
No I don't think your comments are intended to be spiteful. But as noted, they do seem to belie an insensitivity to those who have yet to elected to adopt the label of "Transgender"
Heather W wrote:I for one as well as the other members I know well through here and those I know personally never had any intentions of co-opting this or any other forum.
Nor do I feel you have any nefarious intention to co-opt this forum, however, historically, this is how Tri-ess diminished. . . I am pointing out a trend.
Heather W wrote:IMO believe Tri-Ess serves a valuable role as studies show 75% or more of CDs are heterosexual. My question to you is what have you done to change this? It is easy to sit around and complain but if you truly want something to happen you have to get out of your chair and do something.
I suspect something went amiss in your final sentence. Why would I want to change the sexual identity of an organization that appears to be dying? An organization that does not subscribe wholesale to the idea that all who crossdress are destined to become transgender. Or that crossdressers are destined to become transgender.
Yes, I do bemoan the loss of Tri-ess nationwide and locally. You imply that I have done nothing to remedy that, and you would be wrong.
WARNING THE DISCUSSION MAKES A DARK INTROSPECTION OF REALITY AFTER THIS POINT.
"It is better to light one candle than curse the darkness." It was Carl Sagan in "The Demon haunted world." He discusses the dissemination of accurate knowledge.
I would offer this theory about the difference between crossdressing and
post sex change individuals. It's only a theory, its not my theory but it is also cautionary about being in a hurry to cross that line.
There is a very high rate of juvenile and adolescents who consider themselves "Transgender."[1] Conversely, There is also a high rate of suicide in individuals who have undergone sexual reassignment. Typically 10 to 20 years later.[2] At least one Psychologist at Johns Hopkins has commented:
"
Transgendered men do not become women, nor do transgendered women become men. All (including Bruce Jenner) become feminized men or masculinized women, counterfeits or impersonators of the sex with which they ‘identify.’ In that lies their problematic future."
He goes on to point out:
"When ‘the tumult and shouting dies,’ it proves not easy nor wise to live in a counterfeit garb. McHugh points to the reality that because sex change is physically impossible, it frequently
does not provide the long-term wholeness and happiness that people seek. The most thorough follow-up of sex-reassigned people—extending over 30 years and conducted in Sweden, where the culture is strongly supportive of the transgendered—
documents their lifelong mental unrest. Ten to 15 years after surgical reassignment, the suicide rate of those who had undergone sex-reassignment surgery rose to 20 times that of comparable peers."
From another article[3]
"Guardian Weekend asked Birmingham University's Aggressive Research Intelligence Facility (Arif) to assess the findings of more than 100 follow-up studies of post-operative transsexuals. Arif, which conducts reviews of healthcare treatments for the NHS, concludes that none of the studies provides conclusive evidence that gender reassignment is beneficial for patients. It found that most research was poorly designed, which skewed the results in favour of physically changing sex. There was no evaluation of whether other treatments, such as long-term counselling, might help transsexuals, or whether their gender confusion might lessen over time. Arif says the findings of the few studies that have tracked significant numbers of patients over several years were flawed because the researchers lost track of at least half of the participants. The potential complications of hormones and genital surgery, which include deep vein thrombosis and incontinence respectively, have not been thoroughly investigated, either. "There is huge uncertainty over whether changing someone's sex is a good or a bad thing," says Dr Chris Hyde, director of Arif. "While no doubt great care is taken to ensure that appropriate patients undergo gender reassignment, there's still a large number of people who have the surgery but remain traumatised - often to the point of committing suicide."[3]
I want you to understand, I am not trying to dissuade you from being transgender. I respect our individuality and you decision to become transgender. Just understand, There is more to the issue than may seem obvious. The problem seems to be when you elect to change gender, a strong discordant manifests in your psyche. The pre-sex change counseling either ignores or glosses over that issue. Not to mention, counseling is geared to help you accept your decisions. It does not help or insure the rest of society will accept that decision or that decision will not be
without cost. Nor does this info indicate all transgender end with a bad outcome. They won't, but the risk is there.
Now, I say all this as one who crossdresses. Crossdressers also undergoes stress, but when you undergo a sex reassignment, you lock that decision into your body. For crossdressers, the stress generally stops post orgasmically or after a period of wearing clothing of the opposite sex.
I'll leave it at that.
[1]
https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/ ... /e20174218" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
[2]
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/artic ... ne.0016885" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
[3]
https://www.theguardian.com/society/200 ... socialcare" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;